<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for servetulas.com/blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://servetulas.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://servetulas.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 06:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on American Gothic &#8211; Dexter Season 6 Episode 7 by scott</title>
		<link>http://servetulas.com/blog/2011/11/american-gothic-dexter-season-6-episode-7/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 06:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servetulas.com/blog/?p=608#comment-473</guid>
		<description>I thought that was a really funny gag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that was a really funny gag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on American Gothic &#8211; Dexter Season 6 Episode 7 by Michele</title>
		<link>http://servetulas.com/blog/2011/11/american-gothic-dexter-season-6-episode-7/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servetulas.com/blog/?p=608#comment-455</guid>
		<description>I spotted it, too! I thought it was amazing. That show is incredible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spotted it, too! I thought it was amazing. That show is incredible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on American Gothic &#8211; Dexter Season 6 Episode 7 by Bonny</title>
		<link>http://servetulas.com/blog/2011/11/american-gothic-dexter-season-6-episode-7/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servetulas.com/blog/?p=608#comment-454</guid>
		<description>I spoted it right away very cool. They should do more symbolic stuff. Its fun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spoted it right away very cool. They should do more symbolic stuff. Its fun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Uncanny Valley and Casual Script Typefaces by Onur Yazıcıgil</title>
		<link>http://servetulas.com/blog/2011/10/the-uncanny-valley-and-casual-script-typefaces/comment-page-1/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>Onur Yazıcıgil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 18:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://servetulas.com/blog/?p=593#comment-448</guid>
		<description>Great points from both of you, just to add something to the attempt in adjusting the vocabulary used previously: I would suggest using simply &quot;formal&quot; and &quot;informal&quot; scripts which were the terms consistently used and established in the writings of Hermann Zapf, John Berry and Robert Bringhurst, whom have all contributed on ATypI&#039;s book &quot;Language Culture Type: International Type Design in the Age of Unicode&quot; in 2002. One would appreciate the merits of consensus in that book. For instance, chancery hand would be a &quot;formal&quot; scribal writing whereas the font &quot;Curiz MT&quot; or &quot;Candy&quot; would be an informal script type. The term &quot;casual script&quot; certainly makes sense but &quot;natural scripts&quot; may come across vague.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points from both of you, just to add something to the attempt in adjusting the vocabulary used previously: I would suggest using simply &#8220;formal&#8221; and &#8220;informal&#8221; scripts which were the terms consistently used and established in the writings of Hermann Zapf, John Berry and Robert Bringhurst, whom have all contributed on ATypI&#8217;s book &#8220;Language Culture Type: International Type Design in the Age of Unicode&#8221; in 2002. One would appreciate the merits of consensus in that book. For instance, chancery hand would be a &#8220;formal&#8221; scribal writing whereas the font &#8220;Curiz MT&#8221; or &#8220;Candy&#8221; would be an informal script type. The term &#8220;casual script&#8221; certainly makes sense but &#8220;natural scripts&#8221; may come across vague.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

